A Defective Theory

In Darwin’s Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection believed that fossil evidence to prove his theory of gradual progression from one species into another, would eventually be found.   It has been 150 years and no such evidence exists. Where is the fossil evidence of lizards transitioning into birds?  This I would like to see, since their lung functions are so radically different, it could not have happened gradually nor rapidly.  No fossil transitions equal no proof.  There is not even one fossil showing a transition from scales to feathers, as the theory goes.  There is not even one single example of this anywhere on earth.  Who cares if they claim a “missing link”…excuse me, you have to have a chain to attach a link, right?  Well, the whole chain is missing!

Darwin and most scientists at the time, believed that cells were simple, living organisms, with only a few parts.  This was thought to enable easy mutation or change into different kinds of cells.   Cells are extremely complex, with over one trillion different functions and processes.  More complex than the New York City Metro Transit’s transportation system (including the computers that help run it).  Scientists claim they know all of the key elements that were present when life began on earth, but the fact is that when they bring these elements and conditions under a similar environment, (even voltage equal to lightning, so often claimed as the catalyst), they have not once created life or a life form.  

Hundreds of thousands of fossils have been examined in the last 150 years, and not so much as one time, anywhere, has there ever been discovered a record of a progression of transitional fossils, from one species to another.  Instead, what has been found and widely known as the Cambrian Explosion (of nearly every species) shows life forms showing up, all at once!. It isn’t called an explosion because it happened slowly. It is astonishingly instantaneous; almost like a rapid creation event.

Cellular mutation is not an improvement of the organism.  As cells age, it is like the original copy of the cell has a copy made of itself.  Then, this copy is copied.  That copy is likewise copied, until it becomes much less like the original and has lost much of it’s original cellular integrity.  It is not mutating, it is decaying.  Entropic change moves into a more disorderly, chaotic state, not an improved one. Simply put, it is a dispersal of it’s mechanical energy, not a reorganizing or improving of the specie’s cellular integrity from one type into another, superior specie.  It is a smoothing out process, not a building up process and is consistent with the 2nd and 3rd Law of Thermodynamics.  Darwin realized there was not sufficient fossil evidence in his day to prove his theory of gradual progression, that is from one species into another.  And even his own colleagues noted flaws in his naturalistic speculation.  The search for the missing link seems ludicrous when the entire chain is missing.  

Sir Arthur Keith, a noted anthropologist and devout evolutionist, admits that ”Evolution is unproved and un-provable. We [evolutionists] believe it because the only alternative is special creation, and that is unthinkable?“.  Can intellectuals believe in God? Absolutely! Many intellectuals believe in God. As a matter of fact, your intellect has very little to do with your belief in God. Out of all of the secular professional groups, do you know what professional group has the highest number of believers in God? The astronomers do. Over 90% of the world's great astronomers believe in God. Why? Because they have studied the heavens. It's not a sign of intelligence not to believe in God. If you're intelligent, you have to say, “This must have all been created and organized.”

It is also no coincidence that an increasing number of scientists are withdrawing their support of the theory of evolution. Scientists may see this as an embarrassment many years from now like their predecessors who were once convinced that the earth was flat. Frankly, fossil records simply do not support any credible evidence for evolution. Why continue looking for what does not exist when a simple reading of Romans 1:20 explains it all? “For the invisible things of Him from the creation of the world are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead; so that they are without excuse.”

Be First to Comment

  1. SteBooth said:


    May 13, 2011
  2. PolishBear said:

    DEAR MR. WELLMAN: You understanding of evolutionary biology is sorely lacking. All fossils are “transitional” fossils. All living creatures, including human beings, are “transitional” forms. While it is true that much of the fossil record has been forever erased by billions of years of erosion and other geological processes, archaeologists are always discovering new fossil evidence to fill in some of the gaps. Just out of curiosity, are you a “Young Earth” or an “Old Earth” Creationist.

    May 16, 2011
  3. said:

    Thank you for your comment. I am of the belief that Genesis is not a scientific explanation or time frame for the earth and its age. For example in Genesis 1:1-2 it says, “1 In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. 2 Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep…”. There is no mention of time here and this could be thousands or millions of years. No one knows precisely because there were no human eye witnesses. Again, thank you for your comment.

    May 16, 2011

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *